Kirloskar Oil Engines Ltd's Q2 FY27 numbers came in soft, with revenue of Rs. 2,284.04 Cr (+17.09% YoY) and PAT growth of -18.14% YoY. Here's a quick read of what worked, what to watch, and what management said.
| Results date | November 04, 2026 |
|---|---|
| Revenue (Q2) | Rs. 2,284.04 Cr (+17.09% YoY) |
| PAT (Q2) | Rs. 130.31 Cr (-18.14% YoY) |
| EBITDA margin | 10.99% (-299 bps YoY) |
| EPS (Q2) | Rs. 9.04 (-19.14% YoY) |
Revenue grew 17.09% YoY to Rs.2,284.04 Cr but net profit fell 19.08% YoY as standalone EBITDA margin compressed 299 bps to 10.99% with no sequential recovery, contradicting management's Q1 commitment to improving profitability. The Arka NBFC segment result collapsed 81.95% YoY on rising credit costs (H1 impairment Rs.79.70 Cr vs Rs.33.49 Cr), and consolidated H1 CFO turned negative at Rs.202.94 Cr on a Rs.389.60 Cr inventory build. With H1 EBITDA already −5.07% YoY, management's FY27 EBITDA-delivery commitment is a stretch, though the 48 bps QoQ gross-margin improvement and Kagal capacity online in April 2027 offer recovery levers.
| What management said | Where | What happened | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| "Committed to our EBITDA delivery for the full year" (FY27) | Q1 FY27 earnings call (7-Aug-2026) | H1 FY27 standalone EBITDA Rs.356.57 Cr at 11.11% vs H1 FY26 Rs.375.63 Cr at 13.75% (−2.64 pp) | Stretch |
| Kagal Rs.700 Cr line online by April 2027 (+50,000 engines) | Q3 FY26 earnings call | H1 standalone capex Rs.201.71 Cr (FY26: Rs.317.37 Cr); CWIP Rs.116.15 Cr vs Rs.57.78 Cr | On Track |
| Rs.1,400 Cr capex capitalized over 2 years | Q4 FY26 earnings call (May 2026) | H1 consolidated capex Rs.214.41 Cr | Too Early |
| USD 2 bn (~Rs.16,600 Cr) revenue by FY30 (consol, ex-Arka) | Q3 FY26 / Q1 FY27 calls | H1 consol revenue Rs.4,283.75 Cr (incl. FS) | Too Early |
| "Company expects profitability to improve in coming quarters due to implemented pricing actions and ongoing cost optimization" | Q1 FY27 results communication (Aug 2026) | Margin did NOT improve sequentially (10.99% vs 11.25% standalone EBITDA margin), though EBITDA Rs. rose +15.48% QoQ and gross-margin-like spread improved +48 bp QoQ — direction positive QoQ in absolute EBITDA, margin… | Partially |
| Employee-cost step-up is "structural + timing"; priority is fixed-cost absorption as revenue scales | Q1 FY27 call (Aug 2026) | QoQ employee cost +3.56% vs revenue +18.19% — absorption working sequentially; employee % of revenue down to 6.61% from 7.55% — sequentially | Confirmed |
| Middle East "continued to operate below normal levels" | Q1 FY27 call | Not testable — filing gives no geographic split | Too Early |
| "Not a reflection of any deterioration in the competitiveness of our businesses" | Q1 FY27 call | B2C result +25.80% YoY, B2B revenue +19.82% YoY, DG-led demand intact; but B2B margin −275 bp YoY and FS result −81.95% | Partially |
| Metric | Q2 FY26 | Q3 FY26 | Q4 FY26 | Q1 FY27 | Q2 FY27 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standalone EBITDA margin (filing basis, %) | 13.98 | 12.2 (deck) | 12.6 (deck) | 11.25 | 10.99 |
| Arka AUM (Rs. Cr) | — | — | 7,947 | 7,651 | not disclosed |
| Arka GNPA % | 1.0 | 1.2 | not disclosed | not disclosed | not disclosed |
| Inventory days | — | — | — | 264 | not disclosed |
Disclaimer: This results analysis is published for educational and informational purposes only. It is not investment advice, not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security.